During my first few years as an astrologer, i used to get confused about the variation in results and their timings.
As i got introduced to various ayanamsas like Raman, KP, Chandrahari, Jagannatha etc, i understood many astrologers are as confused as i am.
everyone had their own justifications for their proposals, but chandrahari, raman, n true lahiri ayanamsa was definitely more acceptable to me.
as this is one science which can be interpreted anyway one can imagine, justifying some past charts was easy.
however knowledgeable the astrologer is, his predictions are what matters the most.
and, just from rasi and navamsa no one can really predict anything correctly.
what needs to be practiced is a dynamic approach.
make a chart from
the time of birth,
the time of question and then combine the 2 results along with the lakshanams and nimithams(signlas from nature) you receive during your thought.
this works better.
As i got introduced to various ayanamsas like Raman, KP, Chandrahari, Jagannatha etc, i understood many astrologers are as confused as i am.
everyone had their own justifications for their proposals, but chandrahari, raman, n true lahiri ayanamsa was definitely more acceptable to me.
as this is one science which can be interpreted anyway one can imagine, justifying some past charts was easy.
however knowledgeable the astrologer is, his predictions are what matters the most.
and, just from rasi and navamsa no one can really predict anything correctly.
what needs to be practiced is a dynamic approach.
make a chart from
the time of birth,
the time of question and then combine the 2 results along with the lakshanams and nimithams(signlas from nature) you receive during your thought.
this works better.
No comments:
Post a Comment